Reviewer Guidelines
Standards and expectations for IJHA peer reviewers.
Guardians of Scientific Quality
Reviewers are essential to maintaining IJHA's reputation for rigorous, ethical anatomical research publishing.
Peer review is the cornerstone of credible scientific publishing. This guide outlines expectations and best practices for IJHA reviewers.
Core Responsibilities
- Evaluate manuscripts objectively for scientific validity and anatomical merit
- Complete reviews within agreed-upon timeframe (typically 14-21 days)
- Declare any conflicts of interest before accepting assignments
- Maintain strict confidentiality of all manuscript contents
- Provide constructive, specific, and respectful feedback
Review Criteria
When evaluating an anatomical manuscript, consider:
- Originality and significance of the research question
- Appropriateness of study design and methodology
- Quality and interpretation of anatomical data
- Clarity and logical flow of presentation
- Compliance with ethical standards for cadaveric research
Ethical Conduct
Reviewers must adhere to COPE guidelines. Do not use ideas or data from manuscripts under review for personal benefit. Report any suspected ethical violations to the Editor-in-Chief.
