Choose Your Submission Method

We offer two convenient online submission pathways designed to accommodate different researcher needs. Select the method that best suits your manuscript and workflow preferences.

Article Types We Publish

We accept diverse manuscript types that advance understanding of arthritis pathophysiology and rheumatic disease mechanisms. Each submission undergoes rigorous peer review by experts in rheumatology, immunology, and musculoskeletal research.

Pre-Submission Checklist

Ensure your manuscript is complete and properly formatted before submission. This checklist helps prevent delays and facilitates efficient processing through our editorial workflow.

Peer Review Timeline

We maintain transparent, predictable timelines throughout the review process. Our commitment to rapid yet rigorous peer review ensures your research reaches the community promptly while maintaining the highest quality standards.

Why Researchers Choose Arthritis Research and Therapy

Manuscript Preparation Guidelines

Structure Your Manuscript

Organize your research article following standard scientific format to facilitate peer review and reader comprehension:

• Title: Concise, descriptive title accurately reflecting your study's focus on arthritis mechanisms or pathophysiology
• Abstract: Structured abstract (250 words) with Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusions sections
• Keywords: 5-8 relevant terms for indexing (include MeSH terms where applicable)
• Introduction: Clear rationale, research gap, and study objectives within arthritis pathophysiology context
• Methods: Detailed methodology enabling reproducibility, including disease models, assays, and statistical analyses
• Results: Logical presentation of findings with appropriate figures and tables
• Discussion: Interpretation of results, mechanistic implications, limitations, and future directions
• Conclusions: Clear summary of key findings and their significance to arthritis research
• References: Complete citations formatted according to journal style

Reporting Standards

Adhere to appropriate reporting guidelines based on your study design:

• ARRIVE Guidelines: Required for all animal studies investigating arthritis models or disease mechanisms
• MIQE Guidelines: Essential for gene expression studies using qPCR or RT-PCR methodologies
• STROBE Statement: Mandatory for observational studies examining disease associations or biomarkers
• PRISMA Guidelines: Required for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of mechanistic studies
• CONSORT Statement: Necessary for randomized controlled trials testing interventions

Figure and Table Requirements

• High-resolution figures: 300 DPI minimum, TIFF or EPS format preferred
• Clear, readable labels and legends for all visual elements
• Color figures acceptable for online publication at no additional cost
• Tables formatted in Word or Excel with clear column headers
• Each figure and table must be cited in the main text

After Submission: What to Expect

Immediate Confirmation

Upon successful submission, you'll receive an automated confirmation email containing your manuscript tracking number and submission details. This number allows you to monitor your manuscript's progress through the review process.

Editorial Assessment

Our editorial team conducts an initial assessment within 3 days, evaluating:

• Alignment with journal scope and focus on arthritis pathophysiology
• Scientific merit and methodological rigor
• Originality and contribution to the field
• Completeness of submission materials
• Adherence to ethical standards and reporting guidelines

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts passing editorial screening are sent to expert reviewers specializing in relevant areas of arthritis research, rheumatology, or immunology. Reviewers evaluate:

• Scientific validity and experimental design
• Appropriateness of methodology and statistical analyses
• Significance of findings to arthritis pathophysiology
• Clarity of presentation and logical flow
• Adequacy of discussion and interpretation

Decision Outcomes

Based on reviewer recommendations, you'll receive one of the following decisions:

• Accept: Manuscript approved for publication with minimal or no changes
• Minor Revision: Small modifications required, typically addressing specific reviewer concerns
• Major Revision: Substantial changes needed, may require additional experiments or analyses
• Reject: Manuscript does not meet publication standards or scope requirements

Revision Submission

If revisions are requested, submit your revised manuscript with:

• Point-by-point response to each reviewer comment
• Tracked changes document showing all modifications
• Clean version of the revised manuscript
• Any additional data or analyses requested by reviewers