Pharmacogenomics and Drug Response
Studies linking variants and pathways to dosing, efficacy, toxicity reduction, and individualized prescribing frameworks.
Contribute clinically meaningful precision and personalized medicine research designed to improve real-world decisions across multidisciplinary care pathways.
We invite clinically relevant manuscripts that improve diagnosis, treatment pathways, clinical outcomes, and long-term patient quality of life.
International Journal of Personalized Medicine welcomes rigorous submissions in pharmacogenomics, biomarker-guided therapy, multi-omics translation, precision diagnostics, AI-supported risk stratification, and adaptive treatment strategy design.
Priority is given to studies that combine methodological strength with practical implications for decision-making in clinics, multidisciplinary tumor boards, and precision-care pathways.
The journal values evidence that advances standards of care, strengthens risk stratification, and clarifies outcomes across diverse patient populations and healthcare settings.
Studies linking variants and pathways to dosing, efficacy, toxicity reduction, and individualized prescribing frameworks.
Evidence on diagnostic markers, response prediction, and treatment selection that improves outcome precision.
Genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic models that inform robust, clinically interpretable risk or response profiles.
Validated machine-learning models for patient stratification, prognosis, and decision support with transparent evaluation metrics.
Targeted therapy strategy reports, molecular board workflows, and clinically actionable interpretation pipelines.
Implementation-focused studies connecting discovery-stage evidence with real-world personalized treatment pathways.
Editorial triage and review prioritize transparent methods, defensible interpretation, and clinical relevance.
Authors are encouraged to describe implementation context, including service constraints and resource conditions, so readers can evaluate transferability of findings.
Multicenter submissions should clarify center-level variation handling and protocol harmonization strategy to strengthen reproducibility claims.
Multiple manuscript categories are accepted when evidence quality and reporting standards are met.
Prospective or retrospective analyses with robust methodology and clinically interpretable outcomes.
Protocol-based evidence synthesis with transparent search and selection logic.
Mechanistic or biomarker studies linked to diagnostic or therapeutic decision value.
Operational research on pathway redesign, quality improvement, and access optimization.
Focused findings with immediate relevance and strong methodological framing.
Evidence-grounded expert viewpoints on evolving standards and strategic priorities.
Both submission options are supported by the same editorial team and quality framework.
Recommended for teams needing structured data fields, formal revision tracking, and institutional workflow compatibility.
Suitable for rapid initial intake when authors require a streamlined process and direct communication.
Scope and formatting questions can be sent to [email protected] before submission to reduce avoidable delays.
After submission, manuscripts move through editorial screening, specialist reviewer assignment, and decision communication with actionable revision priorities.
High-quality studies that align with these priorities are positioned for global open access visibility through the journals indexing ecosystem.
High-impact manuscripts typically explain how findings alter diagnosis, treatment selection, or patient pathway planning in real practice.
Authors should state endpoint hierarchy clearly so reviewers can assess interpretive strength without ambiguity.
Submissions addressing underserved populations and implementation barriers are strongly encouraged.
Structured reporting improves review efficiency and reduces avoidable revision cycles.
Collaborative multicenter studies are welcome when data governance and method consistency are clearly documented.
High-impact manuscripts typically explain how findings alter diagnosis, treatment selection, or patient pathway planning in real practice.
Authors should state endpoint hierarchy clearly so reviewers can assess interpretive strength without ambiguity.
Submissions addressing underserved populations and implementation barriers are strongly encouraged.
Structured reporting improves review efficiency and reduces avoidable revision cycles.
Collaborative multicenter studies are welcome when data governance and method consistency are clearly documented.
High-impact manuscripts typically explain how findings alter diagnosis, treatment selection, or patient pathway planning in real practice.
Authors should state endpoint hierarchy clearly so reviewers can assess interpretive strength without ambiguity.
Submissions addressing underserved populations and implementation barriers are strongly encouraged.
Structured reporting improves review efficiency and reduces avoidable revision cycles.
Collaborative multicenter studies are welcome when data governance and method consistency are clearly documented.
High-impact manuscripts typically explain how findings alter diagnosis, treatment selection, or patient pathway planning in real practice.
Authors should state endpoint hierarchy clearly so reviewers can assess interpretive strength without ambiguity.
Submissions addressing underserved populations and implementation barriers are strongly encouraged.
Structured reporting improves review efficiency and reduces avoidable revision cycles.
Collaborative multicenter studies are welcome when data governance and method consistency are clearly documented.
Choose your preferred submission workflow and move your manuscript into a rigorous, clinically focused peer review process.
Editorial office: [email protected]