Review Templates
Structured sections covering methods, interpretation, ethics, and disclosures.
Reviewer Resource Center
Reviewer Resources
Reviewer Resources
Journal of Sinusitis
Use structured tools to deliver clear, consistent, and decision-ready peer review reports for JS.
RigorousReview Standards
FastPublication Process
GlobalResearch Community
OpenAccess Publication
Reviewer Toolkit
Resources Available to JS Reviewers
JS provides practical resources that improve consistency, clarity, and evaluation quality.
Resource-supported review reduces omission risk and improves recommendation usefulness for editorial decisions.
These tools help reviewers handle complex submissions with better structure and confidence.
Resource Components
Tools That Improve Review Quality
Structured resources support both new and experienced reviewers.
Policy Summaries
Quick references for conflicts, confidentiality, and escalation criteria.
Checklist Aids
Stepwise prompts to reduce omission risk in technical reviews.
Escalation Guidance
Defined routes for reporting significant integrity concerns.
Communication Tips
Guidance for clear, constructive, and neutral review language.
Standards Updates
Periodic reminders on evolving reporting and policy expectations.
Efficiency Outcome
How Resources Improve Turnaround
Consistent resource use improves both quality and workflow reliability.
- Reduces effort required to structure complete review reports.
- Improves consistency of evidence-based critique across assignments.
- Clarifies major versus minor concerns for authors and editors.
- Supports fair handling of policy and ethics-related issues.
- Strengthens editorial decision readiness after review submission.
Submission Planning
Execution Notes for Higher Acceptance Readiness
Use these practical notes to improve clarity, policy alignment, and review efficiency before final upload.
Editorial planning insight: Structured templates reduce omission risk and improve recommendation clarity. This approach helps editors and reviewers evaluate the manuscript faster without sacrificing rigor.
Author workflow guidance: Policy references support fair handling of ethics and conflict-related questions. Teams that apply this step early usually reduce revision friction and protect publication timelines.
Quality acceleration note: Checklist-driven review improves consistency across manuscript categories. The same practice also improves metadata quality and downstream indexing discoverability.
Submission strategy point: Support channels help reviewers resolve procedural questions quickly. It supports stronger decision transparency and more efficient peer-review communications.
Publication readiness reminder: Updated standards references keep reviews aligned with current expectations. This improves consistency between core manuscript sections and supporting files.
Operational recommendation: For reviewer resources planning, document reviewer-response changes against exact manuscript locations; state practical limitations and boundary conditions explicitly. This supports cleaner editorial decisions and faster acceptance readiness.
Use JS Reviewer Resources
Apply templates and policy aids to improve review quality and turnaround discipline.
Editorial office: [email protected]
